Foreman » Packaging

02/25/2014

05:15 PM Feature #4452 (Closed): Build all non-SCL dependencies for EL7

We have dependencies on non-SCL packages from EPEL and hosted by ourselves for the installer and Hammer, which need b... Dominic Cleal

05:13 PM Feature #4451 (Closed): Build all ruby193 dependencies for EL7

All ruby193 packages outside of the stock RHSCL need spec file macros updating and rebuilding for EL7. This should m... Dominic Cleal

02/13/2014

10:02 AM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

The idea came out of a user's complaint in #theforeman the other day. I'm happy to let it bitrot, I was just interes... Dominic Cleal

09:58 AM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

Has this been requested by users or is it a nice to have feature? In the latter case I'm afraid it will bitrot and on... Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

09:34 AM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

I share lzap thoughts, I prefer one more repo than less maintained packages. Benjamin Papillon

02/11/2014

05:16 PM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

Correct. Dominic Cleal

05:16 PM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

I am generally against pulling deps into our repos - security issues etc. Is the only motivation less repos configured? Lukas Zapletal

02:00 PM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

Indeed, optional is what I'd meant. -deps is what I'd assumed too, similar to pl-deps. Dominic Cleal

01:59 PM Feature #4313: Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

I'd prefer to make that optional. I was thinking of a foreman-deps repo, but that implies it's a requirement. Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

12:11 PM Feature #4313 (Rejected): Replace EPEL dependency with Foreman repo

On EL6, we currently have the following repos:
1. base OS
2. Foreman
3. EPEL
4. SCL
Optionally, you can add ... Dominic Cleal