Activity
From 10/30/2016 to 11/28/2016
11/28/2016
- 05:59 PM Bug #17506 (Closed): smart-proxy Error while getting IP from AD DHCP (undefined method `key?')
- 05:56 PM Bug #17506 (Resolved): smart-proxy Error while getting IP from AD DHCP (undefined method `key?')
- Thanks guys, I've applied the change in your commit and that fixed the issue for me.
- 03:20 PM Bug #17506: smart-proxy Error while getting IP from AD DHCP (undefined method `key?')
- The fix merged in https://github.com/theforeman/smart-proxy/commit/9bee3fca64f756b761076af14f37e99d054cb693.
- 03:16 PM Bug #17506: smart-proxy Error while getting IP from AD DHCP (undefined method `key?')
- I guess this is related to #17387
- 02:59 PM Bug #17506 (Closed): smart-proxy Error while getting IP from AD DHCP (undefined method `key?')
- After upgrading Foreman (CentOS 7) and Smart-Proxy (Windows) from 1.13.1 to 1.13.2 I'm getting the following error on...
- 06:06 AM Feature #17500 (Closed): Introduce providers for realm module
- 06:03 AM Refactor #17499 (New): Leases by mac and hosts by mac mappings in subnet service do not need to be grouped by subnet
- 05:58 AM Bug #17373 (Resolved): ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- I'm closing this issue: the root cause has been addressed by http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17387.
11/25/2016
- 12:48 PM Support #17462 (Resolved): failed to import classes
- It seems i missread doc, all ok and thank you.
- 11:45 AM Support #17462: failed to import classes
- Dominic, works fine ), thank you very much --> so the issue was ruby version, my fault
I've setup also directory env...
11/24/2016
- 06:30 AM Support #17462: failed to import classes
- Thanks, that does confine the problem to the smart proxy, but doesn't show any likely cause.
Re-reading the descri... - 06:10 AM Support #17462: failed to import classes
- Hi Dominic,
Back with answers:
*Note:* I have left only 2 modules, removed * of them for debugging purposes. ... - 04:52 AM Support #17462: failed to import classes
- oki, I will test this today and update.
- 04:00 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > Parsing leases file does not provide network info either - all of that comes from smart-proxy parsing of config fil...
11/23/2016
- 07:19 PM Feature #2482 (Ready For Testing): Global search in DHCP reservations/leases using MAC and/or hostname
- 07:17 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > Omapi is limited to lookup/create/update/delete for leases, reservations, and a couple more objects. We need to par...
- 04:30 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > Before I submit a PR, would you please review https://github.com/korekhov/smart-proxy/commit/ce25338033c4d5bb80c57d...
- 04:17 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > I was asking that question in my original issue, but never got the answer - why smart-proxy needs to read leases fi...
- 08:34 AM Support #17462: failed to import classes
- The smart proxy log looks reasonably successful, it's listing manifests that are being parsed for classes. I'd sugges...
- 07:26 AM Support #17462 (Resolved): failed to import classes
- Hi,
it seems I am having some problems when importing classes. After a lot of trials I think I should raise this is... - 04:43 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- I don't think we ought to discuss degrees of horribleness when we know we can do better.
To reiterate: If we were... - 03:46 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- Dmitri, external DHCP setup is fully supported feature of Satellite 6.1+ and documented here:
https://access.redha...
11/22/2016
- 08:18 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > > The second thing is a global search for a MAC, IP or hostname - I went through current DHCP APIs and I don't see ...
- 06:24 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- Going back to performance, HA and such.
I was asking that question in my original issue, but never got the answer - ... - 01:30 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > Is this with the dataset in the original ticket? Lease record won't get loaded now if it's expired (based on 'ends'...
- 12:57 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > I wonder if this would be better implemented on Foreman side, as it would be easier to manage the whitelist from th...
- 12:42 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > It is mostly about keeping Foreman itself in a cleaner state - I'd like to have an ability to filter out subnets th...
- 12:27 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > Is this is a performance or a security concern? If it's the former, filtering out networks won't affect loading/rel...
- 08:01 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > There are only a couple of things left - regular expressions in white/blacklist to include/exclude networks. In my ...
- 07:58 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- Konstantin Orekhov wrote:
> There are only a couple of things left - regular expressions in white/blacklist to inclu... - 07:25 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- > One more thing I just realized - none of the leases were actually loaded, only host reservations. Is this by design...
- 12:04 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- This is not an issue in 1.11.x and prior as far as I can tell, but 1.13.1 has it for sure. Don't have 1.12 anymore, s...
- 08:02 AM Bug #17387 (Closed): Speed up Proxy::DHCP::SubnetService#find_subnet
- Applied in changeset commit:c16b176dd1e258188e7bc158247b3319c80e6576.
- 07:44 AM Revision c16b176d: fixes #17387 - SubnetService#find_subnet has constant time lookup
- find_subnet is now approximately constant with the number of subnets
configured, using hash lookups of possible netwo...
11/21/2016
- 09:06 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- One more thing I just realized - none of the leases were actually loaded, *only* host reservations. Is this by design?
11/20/2016
- 05:22 PM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- > While not ideal, NFS is still a very important part of HA strategies, mainly because of its simplicity. As we discu...
- 04:18 PM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- While not ideal, NFS is still a very important part of HA strategies, mainly because of its simplicity. As we discuss...
11/19/2016
- 04:08 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- Confirmed - the fix from https://github.com/theforeman/smart-proxy/pull/476 is amazing!
It only takes 30 sec to lo...
11/18/2016
- 06:25 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- It looks like the pause is due to ruby VM garbage collector which runs several major and minor garbage collections in...
- 04:50 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- On ruby 2.3.1 with the changes in http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17387 applied, smart-proxy starts in less tha...
11/17/2016
- 06:18 PM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- To answer some of your questions, guys:
1. This particular instance has 30K host records and ~82K lease records in... - 07:10 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- Dmitri Dolguikh wrote:
> We should be seeing debug output if leases/reservations are being added/removed, I'd say th... - 06:51 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- We should be seeing debug output if leases/reservations are being added/removed, I'd say the thread is blocked/hangin...
- 06:08 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- Konstantin, I suspect that the pauses are caused by large numbers of host { } entries being processed. Could you indi...
- 05:31 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- The stack trace from when the USR1 signal arrived is quite telling:...
- 05:12 AM Bug #17373: ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- I don't think filtering on networks would help. We need to parse individual records before making a decision whether ...
- 05:05 AM Bug #17373 (New): ISC dhcp provider is unable to handle very big networks
- After the upgrade and modifications to dhcp.yml, restart of smart-proxy took 4 hours (based on the debug messages in ...
- 12:04 PM Bug #17387 (Ready For Testing): Speed up Proxy::DHCP::SubnetService#find_subnet
- 12:02 PM Bug #17387 (Closed): Speed up Proxy::DHCP::SubnetService#find_subnet
- Current implementation is O(n), it can be made O(log n).
- 02:59 AM Bug #2687: Performance issues with large ISC dataset (DHCP smart proxy)
- Please open a new issue for any further problems, this one is linked to already shipped changes so won't be re-opened.
11/16/2016
- 08:33 PM Bug #2687: Performance issues with large ISC dataset (DHCP smart proxy)
- Hello, guys!
Thanks for working on this, but I still have any issue even after upgrading to 1.13.1. After the upgr... - 10:33 AM Bug #14808 (Duplicate): Foreman-Proxy DHCP class doesn't properly read subnets containing if statements
- This appears to be a duplicate of http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/16079 which has now been resolved.
- 10:24 AM Bug #1280 (Resolved): MS DHCP ignores address exclusions
- This has been fixed in Ms dhcp provider on Windows Server 2012 platform (please note there won't be a fix for Windows...
- 10:21 AM Bug #6916 (Resolved): MS DHCP Timeout
- Ms dhcp provider has been re-written and the issue should be resolved now. I'm going to close the ticket, please re-o...
- 10:15 AM Refactor #12394 (Resolved): Netsh Deprecated in Windows 2012R2
- The new version of ms dhcp provider doesn't rely on netsh. Closing the ticket.
- 10:14 AM Bug #13420 (Resolved): [Smart proxy] provider dhcp_native_ms DELETE method broken
- Ms dhcp provider has been re-written (see http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7766), and this should be resolved. P...
- 10:08 AM Bug #15451 (Resolved): Occasionally a MS DHCP delete operation fails
- Ms dhcp provider has been re-written (see http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7766), it's unclear if this is applic...
- 10:05 AM Feature #15554: Add lease deletion facility to dhcp providers
- Re-wording the ticket, as this is applicable to more than just ms dhcp provider.
- 10:02 AM Bug #15789 (Resolved): In MS DHCP provider general/Vendor options must exist before assigning values to them
- This isn't applicable to the rewritten MS DHCP provider (see http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7766). Closing the...
- 10:02 AM Feature #15874 (Closed): Log X-Request-ID by default
- Applied in changeset commit:b39011ebe34b83442bb8c256dd400f494f235389.
- 10:00 AM Bug #16056 (Resolved): Non-english locale casuses "Vendor Class not found" errors when using windows dhcp provider
- 09:56 AM Bug #16056 (Closed): Non-english locale casuses "Vendor Class not found" errors when using windows dhcp provider
- http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7766 which resolves this issue has now been merged. I'm closing this ticket.
- 09:39 AM Revision b39011eb: Fixes #15874 - added logging of 'X_REQUEST_ID' http headers
- 08:01 AM Bug #17172 (Closed): SSH BMC provider does not return IP address
- Applied in changeset commit:012ccb55ed5a12dedbbf21162c0bc4aab17c2724.
- 08:01 AM Bug #16079 (Closed): ISC DHCP subnets fail to parse with host or class stanzas inside
- Applied in changeset commit:7f016ecae66ceb53f2144fb176092a2c034c62bb.
- 07:33 AM Revision 012ccb55: Fixes #17172 - SSH BMC network details implementation
- 07:28 AM Revision 7f016eca: Fixes #16079 - subnet recursive parsing
11/14/2016
- 09:18 AM Bug #17327: Unable to use multiple FreeIPA servers to enroll to REALM
- Should this be filed in the smart proxy if it's meant to fall back to a secondary URL? Or are you implying it should ...
- 09:12 AM Bug #17327 (New): Unable to use multiple FreeIPA servers to enroll to REALM
- Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349487
Description of problem:
We have an IDM solution wi... - 08:01 AM Refactor #17037 (Closed): Replace Resolv::DNS#getname calls with Resolv::DNS#getresource
- Applied in changeset commit:522231bf3e4c918ee821a73acb3f70459ca57791.
- 07:13 AM Revision 522231bf: Fixes #17037 - Resolver::DNS#getresources is used now.
- It replaces calls to Resolver::DNS#getaddresses and
Resolver::DNS#getnames in dns module and its providers. - 07:11 AM Feature #15874 (Ready For Testing): Log X-Request-ID by default
11/11/2016
- 12:19 PM Feature #17319 (Rejected): Handle kerberos ticket expiration in Gss nsupdate module
- When using Windows 2008 AD, kerberos ticket is retained by the module after its expiration. This leads to failures wh...
- 06:54 AM Bug #16079 (Ready For Testing): ISC DHCP subnets fail to parse with host or class stanzas inside
- 04:20 AM Bug #16079: ISC DHCP subnets fail to parse with host or class stanzas inside
- Regression introduced by #12211
11/10/2016
- 10:08 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- Please see the description of the problem above. Accessing leases file over NFS isn't going to work with this impleme...
- 10:04 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- > Restarting the smart-proxy after deleting the host does not remove the entry from the leases file.
Restart it be... - 09:59 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- Yes, we're mounting over NFS. The smart-proxy and DCHP server are in the same cluster and traffic is layer 2 so laten...
- 04:20 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- Accessing leases file over NFS will absolutely destroy the performance: we no longer will be able to track updates an...
- 04:12 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- I think NFS support is important, as I know multiple users who uses HA solution for dhcp proxy using shared NFS stora...
- 04:11 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- does it make sense to check if its mounted as NFS ?
also, should we provide a fall back option? - 03:55 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- > Environment:
> ISC-DHCP-Server version 4.3.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS server
> Smart-Proxy version 1.13.1 on separate ... - 03:36 AM Bug #17301: ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- 1) Are you using NFS here?
> ISC-DHCP-Server version 4.3.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS server
> Smart-Proxy version 1.13.... - 09:01 AM Bug #7766 (Closed): ms_native dhcp smart proxy code scales poorly
- Applied in changeset commit:14d8e52338553fbf6a54587a4e2459c4ffb86fb8.
- 08:36 AM Revision 14d8e523: Fixes #7766: ms dhcp provider uses native dhcps api now.
11/09/2016
- 05:49 PM Bug #17301 (Closed): ISC DHCP known reservations/leases not updated over NFS
- After upgrading to 1.13.1 the DHCP behavior is not consistent -
* Adding a host successfully retrieves an available ... - 11:01 AM Bug #17125 (Closed): Allow windows service name to be specified
- Applied in changeset commit:65d1b8de480e7dd911d76271c03014d37b538147.
- 10:36 AM Revision 65d1b8de: fixes #17125 - Prompt for Windows service name
- Useful if you need to install multiple proxy services on the same
Windows server. - 06:55 AM Feature #17289 (New): Call stop on running async services on proxy shutdown
- 06:53 AM Feature #15874 (Assigned): Log X-Request-ID by default
11/08/2016
- 07:01 AM Bug #17262 (Closed): BmcApiTest.test_api_can_pass_empty_body_and_get_415_error fails with a 400 response code
- Applied in changeset commit:c896ba33f51dbafe6ca161ba7b204d63df6131fa.
- 05:01 AM Bug #17262 (Ready For Testing): BmcApiTest.test_api_can_pass_empty_body_and_get_415_error fails with a 400 response code
- 04:51 AM Bug #17262: BmcApiTest.test_api_can_pass_empty_body_and_get_415_error fails with a 400 response code
- rdoc was updated from 4.2.2 to 4.3.0 and now permits the json 2.x gem series from 1.8.x. This now allows for an empty...
- 04:37 AM Bug #17262 (Assigned): BmcApiTest.test_api_can_pass_empty_body_and_get_415_error fails with a 400 response code
- 03:11 AM Bug #17262 (Closed): BmcApiTest.test_api_can_pass_empty_body_and_get_415_error fails with a 400 response code
- The following test has started failing:...
- 06:08 AM Revision c896ba33: fixes #17262 - verify the JSON request body contains a hash
- The json 2.x gem now parses strings and other non-hash root nodes, so
the data type need to be checked when parsing J... - 03:01 AM Bug #17069 (Closed): foreman-debug to collect whole newest (log)files instead of tailing all (log)files
- Applied in changeset commit:2cc33adc5e63fb0acf35f714ec3372c5ee555d3d.
- 02:23 AM Bug #17261 (Duplicate): Foreman debug does not collect Puppet 4.0+ paths
- They are now at:
- /etc/puppetlabs/
- /var/log/puppetlabs
- /var/log/puppetserver
Coming from https://github... - 02:22 AM Revision 2cc33adc: Fixes #17069 - foreman-debug counts size instead lines
- Update calling add_files (modified in foreman-debug).
Fixes #17069
Signed-off-by: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
11/04/2016
- 01:30 PM Feature #3034 (Ready For Testing): TFTP file download should be synchronous and handle errors
11/03/2016
- 08:18 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- Yes, it appears to be a complete log, but it's unclear what it's a log of without the corresponding Foreman log or an...
- 07:41 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- The issue should be quite easy to reproduce. Just create a host, delete it, and create it again using the same hostna...
- 06:38 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- Which part of the logs is the host deletion? (No corresponding Foreman logs.) What's going on in this paste - is it ...
- 06:27 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- ...
- 05:23 AM Bug #17194 (Need more information): Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- Jon Skarpeteig wrote:
> There's no record in the foreman-proxy log of any delete attempts, only the omshell create o... - 05:16 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- In case the occasional google search ends up here, here's my workaround:...
- 05:13 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- There's no record in the foreman-proxy log of any delete attempts, only the omshell create ones. I was expecting some...
- 05:07 AM Bug #17194: Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- Could you provide Foreman and Smart Proxy logs please? I would like to determine if the deletion is at least attempte...
- 05:05 AM Bug #17194 (Resolved): Deleting a host doesn't delete ISC-DHCP entry
- Creating a host successfully creates ISC-DHCP entry through proxy, but doesn't delete it when deleting host
11/01/2016
- 12:03 PM Bug #17172 (Ready For Testing): SSH BMC provider does not return IP address
- 12:02 PM Bug #17172 (Closed): SSH BMC provider does not return IP address
- The Foreman BMC API requests some additional data from the proxy REST API like IP address, netmask and default gw.
...
Also available in: Atom